Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Oil Temp Gauge Revisited, 200c temp sensor resistance vs temperature
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 02:19 PM
Post #1


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



I think most people are familiar with the Panorama calibration graphics.

Attached Image

What I haven’t been able to find is the actual calibration curve for the 200C temp sensor that goes into the taco plate.

So . . . I went and got the data in an effort to help @ron914 troubleshoot is misbehaving oil temp gauge.

Oil was heated and a Fluke thermocouple meter was used to read oil temp. The resistance of the 200C sensor was measured both while heating and then on the cool down to get the hysteresis.

The pictures I’m going to attach later in this thread were done with a late oil temp gauge. The gauge I used pretty much matched the Panorama calibration graphics.

Here is the chart
Attached Image

Here is the raw data.
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 02:21 PM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



Just beginning - barely above ambient
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 02:23 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



Right around 212 as a boiling water cal point Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 02:25 PM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



300F close to red zone Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 02:26 PM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



Deep into red
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post Jun 18 2026, 03:40 PM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,501
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



Late gauge your using should be 340 degrees at the the red point.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
930cabman
post Jun 18 2026, 03:41 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,712
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



Post #4 is showing 300F and the factory gauge just about to enter the red area.

I'm not liking this picture

My 2056 build (2023) I added a capillary tube gauge measuring at the bottom of the sump.

Hope I am missing something
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Jun 18 2026, 03:45 PM
Post #8


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,902
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



QUOTE(914Sixer @ Jun 18 2026, 05:40 PM) *

Late gauge your using should be 340 degrees at the the red point.

Generally agree

The Panorama calibration graphics show start of red as 300F as I interpret it.

I do see about 340F at the little line on midpoint of the red zone.

Regardless, the gauge lacks numbers due to the variability and hysteresis (below 200F) that limits absolute gauge accuracy. It is intended as a directional, trend indicator not an absolute indication.

Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th June 2026 - 04:11 PM
...