Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1.8 - 2.0 Frankenstein, Using 2.0 C&Ps on 1.8?
SteveNMaine
post Oct 18 2025, 05:31 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 12-August 24
From: Maine
Member No.: 28,288
Region Association: None



Last winter I built a 2056 using a 1975 2.0. This winter I am rebuilding a 1974 1.8.

The 1.8 has one trashed C&P so I am wondering if I can use the old 2.0 C&Ps for my rebuild, using all four of course. Everything seems to fit; head to cylinder register, cylinder to block register, wrist pins for connecting rod, etc. There is only a +1mm difference in bore diameter.

I am not trying to build a HP engine just something close to stock.

Any insights?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike D.
post Oct 18 2025, 10:15 AM
Post #2


OK, It runs now, and pretty good too!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,456
Joined: 3-January 03
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Member No.: 85
Region Association: None



IIRC, I think you would have very low compression. check wrist pin position between the 1.8 and 2.0 pistons.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Oct 18 2025, 10:18 AM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,106
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Agreed. The wrist pin height is different

Get a crank/rods/pair of heads and make a 2.0
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SteveNMaine
post Oct 18 2025, 11:24 AM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 12-August 24
From: Maine
Member No.: 28,288
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mike D. @ Oct 18 2025, 10:15 AM) *

IIRC, I think you would have very low compression. check wrist pin position between the 1.8 and 2.0 pistons.

Yeah, that is one thing I had not checked. The top to the cl of the pin is different.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SteveNMaine
post Oct 19 2025, 06:19 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 12-August 24
From: Maine
Member No.: 28,288
Region Association: None



So, I see two different part numbers for 1.8 pistons and cylinders for 1974, 022 198 075 A and 021 198 075 D.

I have seen the D described as a higher compression design, but will it fit?

Also, the 021 198 075 D is listed as 1.8V and the 022 198 075 A is listed as 1.8

in the Model/Option/Info column of the Porsche parts diagram, what is the difference?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chmillman
post Oct 19 2025, 06:24 AM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 15-June 24
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 28,183
Region Association: Europe



QUOTE(SteveNMaine @ Oct 19 2025, 02:19 PM) *

So, I see two different part numbers for 1.8 pistons and cylinders for 1974, 022 198 075 A and 021 198 075 D.

I have seen the D described as a higher compression design, but will it fit?

Also, the 021 198 075 D is listed as 1.8V and the 022 198 075 A is listed as 1.8

in the Model/Option/Info column of the Porsche parts diagram, what is the difference?


As far as I understood, the V is for carbureted versions (V=Vergaser). I think those were only non-USA cars?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Oct 19 2025, 07:56 PM
Post #7


914 Idiot
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 15,298
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



That's correct. The 1.8V engines ran something like a full point more compression than the regular 1.8 engines. I think it was all in the pistons, as well.

That's the main reason the carbureted 1.8s were rated at 85 HP and the injected ones were rated at 76 HP. (Both DIN spec.)

The 1.8V engines also required high-octane fuel, while the regular 1.8s do just fine on regular-grade.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 04:19 AM
...